#12184772 Mar 19, 2016 at 07:37 PM · Edited over 4 years ago | |
---|---|
![]() Major General 723 Posts | Nah, AFAIK we will still use the official servers for normal flight, impromptu dogfighting, and dinking around. We will just use Richard's for ops and stuff. Or if we feel the need. Or whatever. long live the 88th |
+0 |
#12184919 Mar 19, 2016 at 08:35 PM | |
---|---|
![]() Colonel 46 Posts | #12184753 SNOWY1 wrote: That's not my intention. I see this server as being useful for planned OPS where we need to control visibility of map and the MP range (as the 100nm range on the standard servers is a bit limiting). Also with the awacs changes it should hopefully improve the realism. We will also have control over the logging and tracking. At the moment I'm currently still developing some server changes so the server is up. It's likely to be offline after the weekend until the next planned operation. |
+1 |
#12185775 Mar 20, 2016 at 01:42 AM | |
---|---|
![]() Brigadier Ge... 342 Posts | Hey Snowy and JMav: No, the intent of the private server is not to replace the regular multiplayer servers. In fact, the intent is to only use the private servers for big, organized events. We still need to have our smaller events (the ones that don't really count) on the main servers so that we can be visible. In fact, once Richard and company are comfortable with the server (and no longer need testing), we may even close it except for times that we have a competition, just to be sure we keep visibility (our developers can tell us if/when this should be the case). We are a community, and as such, need to have new folks exposed so that we can have new blood and new ideas. We won't be leaving the main servers unless they make us. :) Raider1 (Combat call-signs: Raid-1, Raid-2) |
+1 |
#12190412 Mar 21, 2016 at 02:27 PM | |
---|---|
![]() Colonel 46 Posts | Server is now offline as I've finished what I wanted to do. It will be back online for the next major event. |
+0 |
#12190765 Mar 21, 2016 at 03:56 PM | |
---|---|
![]() Brigadier Ge... 342 Posts | Richard: I know that a "thank you" doesn't measure when considering how great this contribution is, but let me say it anyway. This is a huge step forward for us, so... THANK YOU!!!! Raider1 (Combat call-signs: Raid-1, Raid-2) |
+0 |
#12191750 Mar 21, 2016 at 08:27 PM | |
---|---|
![]() Captain 240 Posts |
+1 |
#12192321 Mar 21, 2016 at 11:32 PM | |
---|---|
![]() Colonel 264 Posts | I have said this a lot, but we sure have come a long way. FB (primary), fb237, USS_FB, <ICAO>_FB, STS-FB (Space Shuttle) |
+1 |
#13417091 Aug 30, 2017 at 01:56 AM | |
---|---|
![]() 2nd Lieutenant 9 Posts | So what is the server for multiplayer? Fly past obstacles |
+0 |
#13417690 Aug 30, 2017 at 12:49 PM | |
---|---|
![]() Brigadier Ge... 484 Posts | Sorry this server we are nto using anymore. See here for the one we are using: http://opredflag.com/forum_threads/2614497 "No one dared to make a slip, the stranger there among them had the big iron on his hip." |
+0 |
#13418508 Aug 30, 2017 at 11:21 PM | |
---|---|
![]() 2nd Lieutenant 9 Posts | So the server listed there is used for Multiplayer events Fly past obstacles |
+0 |
#13418712 Aug 31, 2017 at 04:52 AM | |
---|---|
![]() Brigadier Ge... 484 Posts | yes "No one dared to make a slip, the stranger there among them had the big iron on his hip." |
+0 |
#13815421 Jul 16, 2018 at 12:58 PM | |
---|---|
![]() Major 21 Posts | Richard nice work and you've customed our own mpserver map!A-WE-SOME! Suggess you're tired from all these things you do for us.Don't you think it's also time for us to make something so incredible like Richard? In search of someone to fly with... |
+0 |
#13815619 Jul 16, 2018 at 05:52 PM | |
---|---|
![]() Major General 723 Posts | We now use this server: http://opredflag.com/forum_threads/2614497 long live the 88th |
+0 |
#13815916 Jul 17, 2018 at 06:48 AM | |
---|---|
![]() Colonel 46 Posts | #13815421 VooDoo3 wrote: Thanks for the appreciation - but we don't use this server anymore; the main thing my code changes had was support for Awacs and teams. @pinto - maybe we should revisit how we do this and whether or not we should look at supporting some version of this in the future. |
+1 |